Started By
Message
locked post

Thoughts on Clemson

Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:10 pm
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:10 pm
Personally, being a SC fan I'd hate it. But it seems like they would be a good fit. Other than the fact that it wouldn't bring anything new in regards to a TV market.
Posted by memphisplaya
Member since Jan 2009
87067 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:12 pm to
Auburn with a lake... frick that
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:13 pm to
They have tradition, a nice stadium, fan support.

Hell the only reason I don't want Clemson in the SEC is South Carolina would lose their recruiting edge in regards to "We play in the SEC".

ETA: Not to mention the old UGA-Clemson rivalry would be renewed.
This post was edited on 6/10/10 at 3:15 pm
Posted by SigmaHog
On da ship
Member since Apr 2010
196 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:27 pm to
Would effing love it.
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:29 pm to
I would like it. It seems as though they have traditions and fan support that mirrors the SEC moreso than the ACC.
Posted by Mikeno
Your friendly neighborhood
Member since Jan 2010
1293 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:34 pm to
I am okay with this, but there are much larger fish to be had as of right now.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
58558 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:37 pm to
the SEC already has 1 Death Valley and 2 Tiger teams, dont need to add to those
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:38 pm to
We're resorting to stadium names and mascots now?
Posted by GeauxColonels
Tottenham Fan | LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
25606 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

the SEC already has 1 Death Valley and 2 Tiger teams, dont need to add to those

...because stadium and school nicknames are the driving factors behind conference expansion right now.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
58558 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:39 pm to
wow i didnt know you were so serious about conference expansion

Posted by TJRibMe
Houston, Mexas
Member since Sep 2004
5227 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:40 pm to
They seem the most logical of all the proposed teams. I know the FL schools are known more for their football, but Clemson seems more SECesque to me. Florida, as a state, just doesn't scream southeast to me. Too many displaced New Englanders.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

wow i didnt know you were so serious about conference expansion

Yeah, it's no big deal or anything. Just changing the whole face of college sports here.
Posted by ForeLSU
The Corner of Sanity and Madness
Member since Sep 2003
41525 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

wow i didnt know you were so serious about conference expansion


the future is at stake right here on this board ipod...sorry, but we don't have time for humor.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
58558 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:45 pm to
i wasnt trying to be funny i just thought we had enough teams named tigers in the conference and got blasted for it.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

i wasnt trying to be funny i just thought we had enough teams named tigers in the conference and got blasted for it.

That's a pretty stupid base to stand on.
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
18225 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:46 pm to
The SEC doesn't need Clemson. The SEC doesn't need an imitation Death Valley. The SEC doesn't need another "Tigers" team.
Posted by Ziggy52
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
198 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:48 pm to
We already have the SC market. Its all about TV $$$$.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296982 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

We already have the SC market. Its all about TV $$$$.


Absolutely.
Every tv pundit repeats this, its been posted a hundred times yet people here don't get it.

Its about expanding geographic markets and increasing revenue. Clemson, FSU, GT and Miami would do little to help.
Posted by CNB
Columbia, SC
Member since Sep 2007
101729 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Every tv pundit repeats this, its been posted a hundred times yet people here don't get it.

quote:

it wouldn't bring anything new in regards to a TV market.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296982 posts
Posted on 6/10/10 at 4:06 pm to
Sorry CNB, not referring to you in particular. See the various Miami, GT and FSu submissions as well.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram