Started By
Message

re: What is the Ideal Team for Jamarcus Russell?

Posted on 5/7/10 at 6:51 am to
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
4955 posts
Posted on 5/7/10 at 6:51 am to
The Globetrotters
Posted by BabyTac
Austin, TX
Member since Jun 2008
12436 posts
Posted on 5/7/10 at 6:55 am to
I'd like to see Parcells give him a chance in Miami. If he buckled down and listened to Parcells it could work out good for both parties considering the Dolphins QB situation.

If he ends up going to another dump team like Cinncy, Cleveland, etc. the result will be the same as it was in Oakland.

Posted by crowbar832001
Member since Dec 2008
3659 posts
Posted on 5/7/10 at 7:29 am to
My gut says he can start and exceed as the 49ers QB.

My break down of all the teams:

Buffalo: 3 QBs; no clear cut starter he could beat them all out with effort. Not a good fit though.

Miami: Colud be the starter today. Good leadership. Could be a good fit.

New England: Excellent fit to learn behind Tom as a BU

New York Jets: Not a good fit.

Baltimore: Not a good fit.

Cincy: Ok fit. Team discipline is always an issue.

Cleveland: Starter in waiting behind Jake could be a good fit but the Browns need more ball players.

Pittsburgh: They won't want to deal with that. They have enough issues. Not a good fit.

Houston: Not a good fit.

Indy: If Jamarcus is going to become a solid player he needs 2 to 3 years of grown (mentally not physically) and what better place.

Jacksonville: Not a good fit.

Tennessee: Not a good fit.

Denver:Not a good fit.

Kansas City: Not a good fit.

San Diego: Not a good fit.

Dallas: too much "crazy". Not a good fit.

NY GIants: Not a good fit.

Philadelphia: Not a good fit because of the fans in Philly.

Washington: I like McNabb. He has put up with a lot of shite. Could be a good mentor.

Chicago: Not a good fit.

Detriot: Not a good fit.

Green Bay: Not a good fit.

Minnesota: I'm up in the air about this one. I am leaning to no though.

Atlanta: Not a good fit.

Carolina: Not a good fit.

New Orleans: Good fit for the same reason as Indy and New England.

Tampa Bay: Not a good fit.

Arizona: Might be the best fit but would be in a real duel with Lienart. No QB leadership to guide him so you would have to rely on WR and coach leadership. WR abilty is a little less then in the past though.

Seattle: Top 2 WRs had sugery and the coach is laid back. OK fit.

San Fran: Could be an excellent fit. Crabtree, Morgan, and Ginn. 3 young recievers. Davis could be a top TE. A hard nosed coach. Could be instant success or crash and burn.

St. Louis: Not a good fit.

So my list for what would be best for him in this order would be:

1. Washington (BU)
2. San Fran (STR)
3. New Orleans (BU)
4. Indy (BU)
5. Arizona (STR/BU)
6. Miami (STR)
7. New England (BU)
8. Cleveland (BU/STR in waiting)
9. Buffalo (STR/BU/STR in waiting)
10. Cincy (BU)
11. Minnesota (BU/STR if Favre doesn't come back)
12. Seattle (BU/STR in waitng)

This post was edited on 5/7/10 at 7:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram