Started By
Message

re: Oil Spill and Offshore Fishing (Latest Developments)

Posted on 5/1/10 at 9:39 pm to
Posted by lsugradman
Member since Sep 2003
8629 posts
Posted on 5/1/10 at 9:39 pm to
They should have had an accurate handle on the initial flow rates from the well,which as I recall were 8000 bopd. So I would say the 5000 bopd current estimates are probably accurate. The reports of the well flowing 20,000 bpd are ridiculous.


quote:

In an interview ( link a few pages back) one of the rig workers said the BOPs had been tested the day before.


I'm not aware of any way of testing the shear rams during operations. And the shear rams are the last and most trusted line of defense. So i dont see how they couldhave known the BOP was working fine. I am sure they probably recentlyhad performed test to ensure the casing would hold though.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 5/1/10 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

They should have had an accurate handle on the initial flow rates from the well,which as I recall were 8000 bopd. So I would say the 5000 bopd current estimates are probably accurate. The reports of the well flowing 20,000 bpd are ridiculous.
Don't know what choke was used for the test. But at that depth, back pressure would be 2,100-2,200 psi?
Posted by TigerFred
Feeding hamsters
Member since Aug 2003
27223 posts
Posted on 5/1/10 at 9:59 pm to
So if the estimates of 5000bpd is accurate what would be the estimate if the well was free flowing around or outside of the BOP?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram