Started By
Message

re: If RS was named the starting QB

Posted on 4/12/10 at 6:22 pm to
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
57556 posts
Posted on 4/12/10 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I would have went and automatically reversed to a 100% Posi-Tiger.


...and then would almost immediately have been dumbfounded that the offense didn't just start clicking the way that you expected it to.

Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
60838 posts
Posted on 4/12/10 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

...and then would almost immediately have been dumbfounded that the offense didn't just start clicking the way that you expected it to.


I think it would click right away and be very successful. It would be once teams adjusted to to strictly running the ball that would concern me.
Posted by TheBob
Metairie
Member since Jun 2005
16940 posts
Posted on 4/12/10 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

...and then would almost immediately have been dumbfounded that the offense didn't just start clicking the way that you expected it to.


No. I'm dumbfounded that we've had the same 2 QB's for three years now and the offense still isn't clicking.

Now go ahead and tell me a little bit about Rummel and their offensive woes.
Posted by cajunjj
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
7427 posts
Posted on 4/13/10 at 9:02 am to
U say RS isn't good enough to be QB & JJ is? U must not watch many LSU games.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram