Started By
Message

re: Stocks...

Posted on 4/14/10 at 10:59 pm to
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/14/10 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

If you don't mind, I may just kind of pick at your response over the course of a few posts as this really is a lot to think about all at once. Two things I'd like to talk about first: Earnings v. Revenues; Taxes



I told you to get a beer, I drank two while I wrote that. Please, take your time, I've got off work tomorrow and Friday. I'm reading Quant and going for a run with my new shoes (maybe some ncaa), and that's it. These are the best kinds of conversations on this board, by far, I enjoy them very much.

quote:

It just seems to me that earnings are what equity investors are most concerned with. How often do you here someone say, "Hey, fizz, when does GOOG report revenues?" Maybe in your line of work you do legitimately hear that. But IME individual investors are fixated on earnings as they are below the line. Revenues mean nothing in and of themselves. It's profit that counts for individual investors.


I personally completely agree with you. I look at the NI number, and I feel like it is more important than EBIT and EBITDA, with CFO/FCFO being a close second. My initial question about revenues is related to my perception of the market's typical reaction to earnings reports. For instance, Alcoa always leads the quarter. They've lost money consistently for a bunch of quarters in a row, but the reaction (at least the past year and a half) is always "but revenue is growing." I'm gauging that off the initial movement of the stock, and of the snippets from analysts in the marketwatch/bloomberg articles I see. Just using that as an example, but I see it all the time. Again, this might be my "market" versus your "market." My market reaction is based off of sell-side analysts quotes and financial media reports, yours seem to be more related to small investors. I think that is the major difference.

My true market following only goes back to 2007, so maybe this is the typical reaction coming out of a recession, just looking for revenue growth, then worrying about efficiency/profitability later. It might also be continuing or be amplified by the ridiculous rally of the last year and the risk trade being back in full force. The easiest way to justify a ridiculous valuation is to focus on revenues and ignore everything else (see: Tech).

I hope that clears up what I was saying, my opinion (earnings are more important) vs what (to me) appears to normally be the market opinion (revenues only matter, frick earnings).

quote:

On to taxes. I was off on my thinking the increase in taxes was due to expansion. I'm going off of memory here and it's been a few weeks since they reported. Here is the exact phraseology from the filings:


I'll break this up into another post and do it later tonight or tomorrow.
Posted by RedStickBR
Member since Sep 2009
14577 posts
Posted on 4/14/10 at 11:12 pm to


Yes, this has been a great discussion. Let's keep it going. I've never been a fan of subjecting myself to only one school of thought, so I am very much eager in learning more about various valuations that you and your colleagues use. The key to being a successful stock market investor is not maximizing potential reward, but rather minimizing potential risk, and you can never have enough knowledge in that respect, which is one of my big arguments for employing both FA and TA. Perhaps my giving JOEZ's increasing revenues such weight, despite their drop off in earnings, is me subconsciously coming around to exactly what it is you're trying to say. It sure seems that way. I'm just lost as to why other investors don't see it the same way. My initial reaction is that they were playing it for the play itself (meaning the earnings announcement) and not for the long-term financial health of the company, which is how I'm playing it.

Also, it does appear that the institutions are hanging on to JOEZ as JOEZ biggest holders have no recent activity since their reporting, which is also in line with your view that the big boys are looking at revs. However, the recent sell volume cannot be denied, so that leads me to believe all of the traders were exiting on lower-than-projected earnings.

Notice there is no recent activity by any of JOEZ biggest holders.

This post was edited on 4/14/10 at 11:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram