- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/17/10 at 3:08 pm to Cash
quote:
I know you are hard core about this sort of thing, but is this really necessary for a movie that is 24 years old?
I never understand the age-of-movie argument against spoilers. There's tons of movies that I have never seen that I know nothing about. A good example is I didn't see No Way Out until about 2 years ago. And I was incredibly happy that I had not been spoiled.
ETA: I watched the movie last night with 2 people who had never seen it and knew nothing about it. Their experience would have been clearly much worse if I had said going in: "Oh, let's watch this one. You'll love it because of the following major plot points and reveals which I am about to enumerate for you in advance of your first-time viewing of the film. You shouldn't mind this because the movie is 24 years old."
This post was edited on 3/17/10 at 3:11 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News