Started By
Message

re: ...why...

Posted on 3/15/10 at 9:56 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84535 posts
Posted on 3/15/10 at 9:56 am to
quote:

(Also, this wouldn't benefit Brees, as Manning had a better post-season from a statistical standpoint.)


So because Brees had a higher passer rating (which takes into account all the statistics), somehow that means Manning had a statistically better post season?

You fail.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9340 posts
Posted on 3/15/10 at 10:02 am to
Based on the stats provided by the OP, Manning is statistically better in the post season. He averages a higher ranking. Do the math, and you'll realize this.
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9340 posts
Posted on 3/15/10 at 10:52 am to
Again, not that it matters, but Manning had a better post-season. At the very, very least it was too close to give Brees some definitive edge.

Manning had more attempts, more yards, more completions, and was 1st in a ton of categories. If you took away the names and just posted the numbers, you'd see this. Brees won the ultimate prize, so none of this matters, but you can't tell me Manning has zero claim for having had a better postseason than Brees.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram