Started By
Message

re: New respect for Livingston Parish Schools

Posted on 2/6/10 at 11:50 am to
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 2/6/10 at 11:50 am to
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District defines free speech rights of students in public schools.

quote:

The court's 7 to 2 decision held that the First Amendment applied to public schools, and that administrators would have to demonstrate constitutionally valid reasons for any specific regulation of speech in the classroom. Justice Abe Fortas wrote the majority opinion, holding that the speech regulation at issue in Tinker was "based upon an urgent wish to avoid the controversy which might result from the expression, even by the silent symbol of armbands, of opposition to this Nation's part in the conflagration in Vietnam," and, finding that the actions of the Tinkers in wearing armbands did not cause disruption, held that their activity represented constitutionally protected symbolic speech.
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33963 posts
Posted on 2/6/10 at 11:51 am to
Thanks Wiki. Nice.
Posted by Catman88
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
49125 posts
Posted on 2/6/10 at 11:53 am to
I would think that it would be pretty easy to prove that a kid wearing that Colts jersey causes disruption in the classroom.

quote:

finding that the actions of the Tinkers in wearing armbands did not cause disruption


This post was edited on 2/6/10 at 11:54 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram