Started By
Message

re: 3rd and Chavis as something that cost LSU = Myth

Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by TigerFan55555
Tomball, TX
Member since Nov 2008
9605 posts
Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Its you that don't seem to understand. Four different LBs had a sack for us this year, meaning we blitzed LBs numerous times


technically it doesnt mean we blitzed numerous times, it means we called different ones...

quote:

We blitzed Coleman more often than not.

I dont believe this... cause we didnt blitz that much
quote:

blitzers can be picked up quite easily by blocking schemes when a DL is playing as poorly as our was this year. And a blocked LB/S is worse than not blitzing him at all, because they very, very rarely do anything after being blocked by a lineman or TE. And now, you have one guy less guy who can cover...


totally agree and got it the first time...believe me I know the DL was horrendous and almost all the blame goes on them for long sustaining drives...but at some point to win close games you have to take risk...and win the down and distance battle...we were never setup with down and distance in our favor...
Posted by Brbengal
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2004
1370 posts
Posted on 1/7/10 at 1:47 pm to
3rd and Chavis is just a catch phrase.

All I know is the defense could not get off the field in critical situations. PERIOD.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram