Started By
Message

re: Brady vs. Brees, stats don't lie.

Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:07 pm to
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33995 posts
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:07 pm to
Brady is better because he didn't suck balls for his first three seasons like Brees did. San Diego actually drafted a quarterback #1 in '04 even when they had a ton of needs because Brees sucked that badly. Now at their best, it's a tossup. Brees has an unbelievably quick release and does a great job with his reads. I love the way Brady operates in the pocket. His footwork is absolutely impeccable. If I had to choose one, I would go with Brady. He put up good numbers with no #1 receiver until Moss came along. Deion Branch, David Givens, David Patten and others have done nothing since leaving New England. Brady also didn't have the luxury of throwing the ball in a dome eight times a year. So, I would give the slight edge to Brady.
Posted by displacedhorn
batonrouge
Member since Jul 2009
932 posts
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:29 pm to
Brady..but you can be crazy and think Bree's.
Posted by rondo
Worst. Poster. Evar.
Member since Jan 2004
77416 posts
Posted on 12/18/09 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

San Diego actually drafted a quarterback #1 in '04 even when they had a ton of needs because Brees sucked that badly.



Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26126 posts
Posted on 12/18/09 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

He put up good numbers with no #1 receiver until Moss came along


While Colston is great and Meachem is emerging this year, I really don't think the saints have had a #1 receiver since Brees has been here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram