- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What really happens in the SEC replay booth
Posted on 11/14/09 at 6:02 am to Methuselah
Posted on 11/14/09 at 6:02 am to Methuselah
quote:you are crazy. Determining whether or not a player is in bounds deserves MUCH scrutiny and certainty than some silly law case that may end in someone being put to death!
Beyond a reasonable doubt is the highest standard used in courts and is reserved for criminal trials. It is stupid to utilze a standard higher than that.
1
Posted on 11/14/09 at 6:08 am to Spirit of Dunson
quote:
Redding said. "There can be no doubt at all for a replay official."
I don't have any problem with that STANDARD. The problem was that, even in applying that standard, there was absolutely no doubt, no room for error on several calls made in that game.
My dad and them play golf with a retired SEC official who remains close with Gerald Hodges, the replay official at the Bama game. He said Hodges phoned him shortly after the game and said he MISSED the call on the Peterson interception.
One cannot MISS that Peterson call, conclusive video evidence was required to have been IGNORED. It was plain as day. Unmistakeable and not open for interpretation. That defines, "no doubt at all" n'est-ce pas?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News