- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

LSU Ranking Question
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:24 am
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:24 am
I know this may be a little out there, but shouldn't a team that only loses to #1 and #2 be ranked #3?... Do you think if LSU wins out that our final ranking could be that high? Wouldn't that make sense?
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:25 am to LSUK1087
Nope. Not a chance in hell.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:27 am to LSUK1087
Should LSU, Florida and Bama all win big in the bowls I could see the Tigers being ranked 3rd. 
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:27 am to LSUK1087
Derek Dooley was asked how LSU could move UP in the BCS polls after losing to Alabama.
Derek's response was that LSU is probably under-ranked. They took the 2 best teams in the nation into the 4th quarter with a chance to win both games. To him, LSU is #3 right now.
Derek's response was that LSU is probably under-ranked. They took the 2 best teams in the nation into the 4th quarter with a chance to win both games. To him, LSU is #3 right now.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:27 am to As RXd
LSU finishes as high as #2 if CIncy loses to WV tonight... TCU loses to Utah tomorrow... Boise drops one at some point.... Georgia Tech loses in the ACC Championship... and one of the top 2 loses in the SEC Championship. The loser of the BCS has a chance of dropping below LSU if we somehow play in the Sugar Bowl or blow out a Big 10 team
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:38 am to chilge1
if lsu just absolutely pounds every body they have left to play including there bowl game imo they should be number 3 maybe 4
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:39 am to chilge1
so is the only way we get in the bcs if bama or flordia drop one before the SECCG?
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:42 am to LSUK1087
nm,
i didn't read your whole post. so i guess its possible.
i didn't read your whole post. so i guess its possible.
This post was edited on 11/13/09 at 10:44 am
Posted on 11/13/09 at 10:54 am to LSUK1087
I remember one year way back (think it was '71), that Nebraska, Okla, Colorado finished 1-2-3. Okla lost only to Nebraska in a classic, Colorado lost only to the two of them, and all three won their bowl games.
Unlikely to happen that way, but never say never.
Unlikely to happen that way, but never say never.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 11:33 am to Rockerbraves
quote:
Should LSU, Florida and Bama all win big in the bowls I could see the Tigers being ranked 3rd.
And Cincy, BSU, TCU, and USC (of course they will be up there regardless of merit)lose big then sure.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 12:13 pm to Ghostfacedistiller
Sure it could happen. Didn't we win a NC with 2 losses? But too many things have to happen. Cincy, TCU, and Boise all have to lose. And if USC wins out BIG - forget it - the media swings from Pete's nutz - they won't let it happen.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 1:25 pm to TYBillyCannon
No, a team that loses to #1 and #2 should not be ranked #3. What if saidteam were to lose by 30 to the #1 and 2 team, but win the rest of their games.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 1:37 pm to uneaux
Dandy Don mentioned we could possibly end up in the Orange Bowl. Did he mean by an "at large bid"?
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Posted on 11/13/09 at 1:38 pm to ScootiniTiger
Sorry, just saw the next post about the BCS possibility.
Posted on 11/13/09 at 2:18 pm to LSUK1087
quote:
shouldn't a team that only loses to #1 and #2 be ranked #3?.
If there are only 3 teams in the set being ranked, that would be a logical conclusion. But with 119 teams, among whom there are 5 or so that haven't lost, and in a system where strength of schedule is (don't argue about this--it is) taken into account in a subjective way, logic doesn't compel your conclusion.
Popular
Back to top
6





