- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"a photo of said gash" per sports illustrated
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:14 pm
quote:
If the Bryant-Denny field could talk ... it may confirm that Patrick Peterson had one foot inbounds during the disputed INT.
ARTICLE LINK
7
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:15 pm to saescott
Thanks! Never seen this before. 
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:15 pm to saescott
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:15 pm to saescott
never saw that pic before
good find
good find
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:18 pm to saescott
You'll never guess where PP's special edition Luftwaffen cleats are made. j/k 
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:22 pm to MondayMorningMarch
That gash was made by his left foot which was irrelevant since he didn't have control of the ball when his left foot hit. The only foot that matters was where his right foot hit. There was not one single video or photo that clearly shows his whole foot is in bounds and NOT touching the white line at all. Because even if 1 mm of his cleat is on the chalk, he's out of bounds. I challenge any of you to post a photo or freeze frame video that shows his RIGHT foot inbounds and NOT touching the white line.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:23 pm to MondayMorningMarch
There was no angle to definitively show ALL of the following required to overturn the call.
1. Julio touching the ball, while,
2. Peterson got a foot in, while,
3. Peterson controlled the ball.
Therefore, the video is inconclusive. Bottom line. It looked like a bad call, but the above is required and simply not there.
I hate contoversy as much as anyone and we've been screwed before too. This however, even if it is indeed a bad call, would not guarantee that you all would have gone 65 yards after netting 11 all quarter.
..now, that being said, let the name calling begin.
1. Julio touching the ball, while,
2. Peterson got a foot in, while,
3. Peterson controlled the ball.
Therefore, the video is inconclusive. Bottom line. It looked like a bad call, but the above is required and simply not there.
I hate contoversy as much as anyone and we've been screwed before too. This however, even if it is indeed a bad call, would not guarantee that you all would have gone 65 yards after netting 11 all quarter.
..now, that being said, let the name calling begin.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:26 pm to tider04
quote:
didn't have control of the ball
At no time did he "not have control of the ball".
Both of his hands are on the ball from the time he catches it until and after he hits the ground.
Funny how everyone except for Bammer fans and Bammer refs say it was an int.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:27 pm to VulcanHammer
Tider04....
You honestly don't think he had control when the gash was made with his left foot?
You honestly don't think he had control when the gash was made with his left foot?
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:27 pm to VulcanHammer
Peterson controlled the ball while his left foot was down. One does not need to tuck a football to establish possession. If he would have never tried to tuck the ball there would be no question. I don't know what Julio had to do with this play, he didn't touch anything.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:28 pm to tider04
It is ludicrous if you, or anyone for that matter believes that. Peterson vividly drug his left foot and touched with his right toe WITH POSSESSION OF THE BALL. That is an interception in everyone book, except yours. Even your coach admitted it.
Geaux Tigers
Geaux Tigers
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:28 pm to VulcanHammer
quote:
Therefore, the video is inconclusive.
it was pretty clear on my 52" HDTV, very clear. I could see the dirt kicked up and the divot left was not even close to the white line.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:28 pm to tider04
quote:
That gash was made by his left foot which was irrelevant since he didn't have control of the ball when his left foot hit. The only foot that matters was where his right foot hit. There was not one single video or photo that clearly shows his whole foot is in bounds and NOT touching the white line at all. Because even if 1 mm of his cleat is on the chalk, he's out of bounds. I challenge any of you to post a photo or freeze frame video that shows his RIGHT foot inbounds and NOT touching the white line.
frick YOU.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:31 pm to Saint Nicholas
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:32 pm to TigerTreyjpg
quote:
You honestly don't think he had control when the gash was made with his left foot
Both hands on the football=possesion. He does not have to tuck the ball away. The video doesn't lie. Both hands on the ball while in bounds, all the way to the ground and after hitting the ground. No bobble, no juggle,......possesion.
This post was edited on 11/9/09 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:34 pm to VulcanHammer
quote:
There was no angle to definitively show ALL of the following required to overturn the call.
1. Julio touching the ball, while,
2. Peterson got a foot in, while,
3. Peterson controlled the ball.
Other than the conclusive video evidence, which everyone wearing crimson colored glasses choose to pretend doesn't exist, I am apt to agree with you.
You get to keep the win, but unforetunately for you, your win against LSU this year, and any subsequent success may come Alabama's way because of it will have an asterisk by it.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:35 pm to tider04
quote:
tider04
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:37 pm to saescott
quote:
"a photo of said gash" per sports illustrated
I bet that spot was re-sodded by the time the sun came up Sunday morning.
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:39 pm to VulcanHammer
go frick yourself and get back to your own board
Posted on 11/9/09 at 1:39 pm to saescott
CBS showed a very similar shot once during the broadcast. They also showed a view from the end zone right down the sideline that shows that PP had the left foot down while controlling the ball and then he drug his right foot. They quickly stopped showing the shot as soon as it proved that there was no doubt he was in bounds.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News