No hyperbole....The Iowa/Indiana game is fixed

i seem to be a soul person who doesn't in a sea of people who think it is, but if you watch the replay not the ones ESPN is showing after the fact, but there is one angle it shows the foot never touching down before the knee, its not the one they keep on showing, the angle im talking about is the angle that came from the other endzone, this angle showed the bottom of his shows, you can see it is not a TD from that angle, but they haven't shown that angle since

trust me if you saw the angle im talking about you may change your statement,

quote:

---

its not the one they keep on showing, the angle im talking about is the angle that came from the other endzone,

---

I have seen it and the angle is not correct. No - you cannot see space between the soles of his shoes and the turf. What you see is INCONCLUSIVE evidence that it MIGHT be incomplete.

But - if you look at the one they keep showing (and they keep showing it because it has DEFINITIVE proof that it was a TD) you will clearly see the foot - and his entire lower leg - dragging on the turf. You can even see the debris being kicked up off the turf trailing his foot.

This is ABSOLUTE proof that his feet were in contact with the turf. The ONLY way that was an incomplete pass is if he didn't have possession until after his foot came up. The video doesn't show that either, but it would be a lot easier to sell than that he didn't have his feet down.

Now the question is = did the replay booth actually look at the DEFINITIVE shot, or did they just glance at the one you mentioned and said 'that's enough - incomplete'

I suspect the latter.

This was a comlete rip-off, bordering on criminal.