Started By
Message
locked post

Selling a Gold Krugerrand?

Posted on 10/11/09 at 7:05 pm
Posted by Joe Joe Joe
Givin' Him the Business
Member since Oct 2007
5746 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 7:05 pm
I've got a 1980 South African 1 oz. Krugerrand. With the rising gold prices hovering over $1000, I'm thinking about selling it. Has anyone had any experience doing this? If so, did you use eBay, a certified buyer, etc.?

I'm just looking for some general advice/comments. I'm still college-aged, so I'm more concerned with its short-term monetary value, rather than long-term investment value. Thanks.
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 7:08 pm to
hang onto it if it was given to you. Gold might be over valued at the moment, but having a krugerrand is pretty cool. And if obama crashes this country into a brick wall, then having a gold coin will come in handy.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

hang onto it if it was given to you. Gold might be over valued at the moment, but having a krugerrand is pretty cool. And if obama crashes this country into a brick wall, then having a gold coin will come in handy.
I have to agree, I would like to own a kregerrand. I wouldnt sell it, and some people say gold is overpriced now, but I read some where that gold might always stay above 1000 so I would hold on to it.
Posted by Joe Joe Joe
Givin' Him the Business
Member since Oct 2007
5746 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

and some people say gold is overpriced now,


That's kind of the reason I want to sell: to get something before the market stabilizes and the gold price goes down. I just need the cash right now; like I said, the long-term investment value is not my main concern.
Posted by TheHiddenFlask
The Welsh red light district
Member since Jul 2008
18384 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 9:46 pm to
Gold is not a good long term investment and it can be backed up by historical data.

Everyone in the world knows that gold is highly overpriced, but doomsday theorists are keeping the price afloat.
Posted by Joe Joe Joe
Givin' Him the Business
Member since Oct 2007
5746 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Everyone in the world knows that gold is highly overpriced, but doomsday theorists are keeping the price afloat.


That's what I was thinking. Might as well turn it over for the most money I can while I can. I'm a year out of college and could use the $1000+ much more than having it sit in my desk drawer for a few years.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Everyone in the world knows that gold is highly overpriced, but doomsday theorists are keeping the price afloat.
yeah Im sure thats why china is buying so much.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:46 pm to
If you need to eat, maybe if you want to buy a new boat no. imo. LIke I said Im high on gold and will always be. people here will tell you that gold is worthless but there is a reason why banks and countries buy so much its worth something to someone.
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:46 pm to
quote:


Gold is not a good long term investment and it can be backed up by historical data.

Gold should never been seen as an asset that produces a return, just a really safe asset.

quote:


Everyone in the world knows that gold is highly overpriced

well except the people that continue to purchase it.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:49 pm to
I dont see why someone would say its over priced. SUpply and demand should debunk that.
Posted by MileHigh
Most likely a mile high
Member since Jan 2004
7920 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 10:53 pm to
quote:

I dont see why someone would say its over priced. SUpply and demand should debunk that.

well I don't know about that. Most of the gold that is traded is paper gold, and that could drive up the value of the physical asset to an unreasonable value. But it should hold value decently in financial turmoil.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 11:43 pm to
There was also plenty of demand for housing in California circa 2004-08. Would you say that, at their historic prices, those houses weren't overvalued? Just sayin.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28140 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 11:44 pm to
Joe joe, I'll give you $1000 for it.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

There was also plenty of demand for housing in California circa 2004-08. Would you say that, at their historic prices, those houses weren't overvalued? Just sayin.
But doesnt the gov. have incentives for buying houses and/ or building them, in a free market. I think if it had been a freemarket it wouldnt have occured as bad as it did.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 11:46 pm to
I'm not sure I understand that comment?
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/11/09 at 11:52 pm to
Alright let me try agian.

Doesnt the gov. have incentives for buying and/or building houses? In a free market, it wouldnt have occured, or if it did it wouldnt have happen as bad as it did.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/12/09 at 12:00 am to
Sure, I don't disagree with that general assertion. Do you think the gold market is a pure free market?
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/12/09 at 12:02 am to
quote:

Do you think the gold market is a pure free market?
Doesnt protectionism (or any interference) in some markets affect others. Im not completely familiar with the gold market. Id be willing to guess that gov is less hands on it, than housing.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 10/12/09 at 12:17 am to
I'm sure you're correct in that statement, but the us housing market isn't likely to be affected by, say, the machinations of a bank in Kazakhstan, whereas the gold market certainly could be. The lack of potential interference by the US gov is more than made up other participants around the world. At least in our housing/gov example, you know what the distortions are. I don't think that is necessarily true for the gold market.
Posted by Tiger4
Member since Jan 2009
8761 posts
Posted on 10/12/09 at 12:22 am to
Early this year IMF said they where going to sell I think it was 300 tons of gold and the price went down about 200$, so I agree that we cant control what other people do but we can help our selves out by keeping our markets free. Because we can guess what will happen if we subsidize one thing but we wont truly ever know imo. and then you have the option to interfere with the markets more or you can let them dictate themselves.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram