Started By
Message
locked post

Jet Lag Syndrome

Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:49 pm
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:49 pm
The following was in an Ala. paper, under the title "5 Things to Watch in SEC":

5 Things to Watch in SEC
Wednesday, September 09, 2009

3. West Coast jet lag. Upset alert: Don't be surprised if Vanderbilt plays LSU close or even wins. LSU lost a day of preparation by traveling back from last week's game at Washington. In the past 10 years, there have been five instances an SEC team followed a West Coast trip by playing a conference opponent in its next game. The team that went West lost four times.

I'll bite on the jet lag excuse once, but not twice. And if true, what friggin' idiot scheduled the home opener 2500 miles away in the Great Northwest, to be followed by a game against a conference foe??

Posted by crankbait
Member since Feb 2008
11640 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:50 pm to
if anyone uses that excuse, then they are a huge puss
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21650 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:50 pm to
If we lose to Vandy, it'll be because of incompetent coaching, especially on the part of Les.


If recruiting rankings are any correlation, then the only teams that should be more talented or even with us are:

USC
UF
Alabama
UT

NOT Vandy or Washington.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

If we lose to Vandy, it'll be because of incompetent coaching, especially on the part of Les.
Posted by guttata
prairieville
Member since Feb 2006
22630 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:53 pm to
If they were to lose, at least they would have a reason.
Posted by Snarf Snarf
Thundera
Member since Jul 2009
524 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:54 pm to
If we loose to Vandy it will be because they score more points than us
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

If they were to lose, at least they would have a excuse
Posted by TampaTiger
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2004
1132 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

If recruiting rankings are any correlation, then...
That's what I've been thinking. Lose to those teams in a hard-fought game, then 'good job boys'. Lose to anyone else, then the Tigers were out-coached...and that includes getting the team ready to play to its fullest potential.
Posted by sader07
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2008
230 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:56 pm to
If it takes you a whole week to re-adjust after spending three days on the West Coast then something's wrong with you. Between classes and practice the players should be back in their routine and fine because of it. Jet lag is no excuse unless we played in London or something like that.
Posted by TigerStuckinOkieland
Oklahoma City, OK
Member since Feb 2007
1330 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:57 pm to
jet lag was, whether you wish to believe it or not, a factor in LSU's less than 100% performance last weekend.

I doubt it will be a big factor coming back to LA. However, I just returned from Lake Tahoe on a 3 day vacation, and am still wanting to sleep til 8-9 am every morning a full week later. And, I don't have to play in a football game. If these kids are sleepwalking thru classes and/or practices for the 1st 2-3 days after their return, it certainly doesn't help matters for LSU.
Posted by jbrau22
Waco, TX
Member since Jun 2007
2134 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:58 pm to
superior recruiting doesn't automatically indicate superior talent...what about 2 and 3 * players who do much better than expected. Or 5 and 4 * players who fail to live up to potential...is that a direct result of coaching? I think not. May sometimes be the case, but we know ranking systems are faulty and they have yet to rank the most important factor that sets our enemy tim tebow ahead of the rest...WILL TO WIN!
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52769 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

jet lag was, whether you wish to believe it or not, a factor in LSU's less than 100% performance last weekend.


another omniscient poster
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

. West Coast jet lag. Upset alert: Don't be surprised if Vanderbilt plays LSU close or even wins. LSU lost a day of preparation by traveling back from last week's game at Washington. In the past 10 years, there have been five instances an SEC team followed a West Coast trip by playing a conference opponent in its next game. The team that went West lost four times.


That statistic is meaningless without information about which SEC teams were involved.

(I assume one of the five teams was 2005 LSU, when it los at home to Tennessee after returning from ASU. There were obviously some extenuating circumstances there. What are the other four examples?)
This post was edited on 9/10/09 at 3:02 pm
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21650 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

That's what I've been thinking. Lose to those teams in a hard-fought game, then 'good job boys'. Lose to anyone else, then the Tigers were out-coached...and that includes getting the team ready to play to its fullest potential.


I wouldn't go that far, b/c other teams have enough talent to catch us on a bad day. And road games are freaking hard in the SEC. Still no excuse to drop 4 or 5 with the talent we have.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52769 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

they have yet to rank the most important factor that sets our enemy tim tebow ahead of the rest...WILL TO WIN!
so you're that cheesy arse fan that espn's little puff pieces cater to. got it.

i knew there had to be someone out there eating that shite up
Posted by Brendoni
Oklahoma City, Ok
Member since Apr 2009
22225 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

The following was in an Ala. paper


imagine that
Posted by TampaTiger
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2004
1132 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

what about 2 and 3 * players who do much better than expected. Or 5 and 4 * players who fail to live up to potential
That's a point, though, respectfully, not a very valid or strong one in this case, since these aberrations should just negate themselves, overall, since that will pretty much be the case for all teams. There are more statistical arguments I could make, but this one makes my point.
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22049 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

That statistic is meaningless without information about which SEC teams were involved.


Here's a few that come to mind:

2005 Ark plays USC 3rd game of the season, loses next week to BAMA.

2007. Tenn plays Cal, next week beats So. Miss but following week lose to Fla

2008. Tenn plays UCLA, next week beats UAB, but following week lose to Fla.

2008. UGA plays Ariz. State, next week loses to BAMA.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21650 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:09 pm to
Look at the rivals rankings. In general, they follow the top 25. With a few exceptions like boise, BYU, and Utah.
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52769 posts
Posted on 9/10/09 at 3:10 pm to
quote:


2007. Tenn plays Cal, next week beats So. Miss but following week lose to Fla

2008. Tenn plays UCLA, next week beats UAB, but following week lose to Fla.
how are these in any way relevant?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram