- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Running game, or lack there of
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:32 am
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:32 am
I am greatly concerned about how our backs are going to function without a solid fullback. Quinn Johnson would have plowed holes in that line for scott to run through. We don't have that battering ram and I think our running game between the tackles will suffer.
Also the second team DLine outplayed the 1's.
Also the second team DLine outplayed the 1's.
This post was edited on 9/6/09 at 2:33 am
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:33 am to Geauxld Finger
o-line disappointed as usual. they better do better or they just might end up being the most overrated unit on the team.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:33 am to Geauxld Finger
Our O-Line or lack there of.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:33 am to Geauxld Finger
yeah not many holes, and i agree about the dline.. looks to be a problem again...
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:34 am to Geauxld Finger
Geauxld Finger, you hit the nail on the head. The lack of a running game is my biggest concern of LSUs performance. People are mad about the defense, but they were on the field for almost twice as many plays as LSU had on offense. LSU did nothing to control the clock and wear down Washington's D plus let our defense rest.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:35 am to Tiger Roux
The problem with the defense is that we can't find a coordinator who will fricking blitz. We should have sent so many different packages at Locker tonight.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:35 am to Leonides
I agree about the blocking, but we averaged 5.1 ypc.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:36 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
The problem with the defense is that we can't find a coordinator who will fricking blitz. We should have sent so many different packages at Locker tonight.
Tenuta was out of a job for awhile... just sayin'
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:36 am to Leonides
We should have dominated them on the lines. No excuse for that. Oline needs to take responsibility for the lackluster offense. I will also say that Crowton called a VERY vanilla game plan. They didn't show a lot and never really found a suitable situation to work Shep in at the wild tiger. But getting beat at the point of attack is inexcusable for the vets we have on the line. Granted many times UW stacked the box, yet we seemed reluctant to stretch the field. We had superior talent, but a very poor game plan.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:37 am to LSU Coyote
quote:
Our O-Line or lack there of.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:41 am to Goose
I don't know that the lack of running game was so much the o-line's fault as it was a lack of diversity in the play calling. LSU could not have run more than three or four different running plays. Other than the option, LSU never tried to run wide on Washington. Where were the end arounds to Holiday or putting Russell Shepard in the wildcat formation? The offensive game plan was very vanilla.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:44 am to Leonides
Slightly off topic, but I was honestly expecting our O line to get slaughtered....hard....you guys were getting pressure for sure, but Locker had enough time to throw alot of balls for completions.
Was our O line underrated or your D line overrated?
Was our O line underrated or your D line overrated?
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:45 am to UWDawgs
we rushed 3 or 4 people the entire game because our new DC is horrible
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:46 am to UWDawgs
Ever since Saban left, we can't figure out that you need to blitz on defense every once in a while in order to be successful.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:48 am to Maximus
quote:
we rushed 3 or 4 people the entire game because our new DC is horrible
We sent a couple blitzes in the first quarter... and then apparently that got boring, so we began showing blitz and dropping back into coverage. Washington looked dumbfounded after this brilliant coaching decision.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:53 am to UWDawgs
UWDawgs,
I think it was a mix of things. The refs rarely called holding on both teams. There was like 2 holding calls the whole game. Also, I think your OLine was better than expected, and our DL made some push, but Locker is elusive. Much like Jefferson, they get away from the rush and make it tough. A mobile QB can make an OL look better than they are.
Our OL looked tired and out of sync. The crowd definitely had an effect with OL timing way off, which gave your DL an edge. I think also, our DL tried too hard (see Alem) and lost their lane responsibilities a few times.
Overall, I think LSU underestimated UW, and a lot of that goes to Miles. I really think he really believed what he said prior to 2007 when he claimed the PAC-10 was weak, and you just spit it back in his face.
In the end, UW will be much improved this season and has a good shot at a bowl. Willingham just couldn't coach leadership once Locker went down last year. The team also quit, plain and simple, so the record is misleading.
Opening games on the road are almost always a struggle for LSU with the exception of the MSU game in 2007. It makes a big difference when you start on the road.
I think it was a mix of things. The refs rarely called holding on both teams. There was like 2 holding calls the whole game. Also, I think your OLine was better than expected, and our DL made some push, but Locker is elusive. Much like Jefferson, they get away from the rush and make it tough. A mobile QB can make an OL look better than they are.
Our OL looked tired and out of sync. The crowd definitely had an effect with OL timing way off, which gave your DL an edge. I think also, our DL tried too hard (see Alem) and lost their lane responsibilities a few times.
Overall, I think LSU underestimated UW, and a lot of that goes to Miles. I really think he really believed what he said prior to 2007 when he claimed the PAC-10 was weak, and you just spit it back in his face.
In the end, UW will be much improved this season and has a good shot at a bowl. Willingham just couldn't coach leadership once Locker went down last year. The team also quit, plain and simple, so the record is misleading.
Opening games on the road are almost always a struggle for LSU with the exception of the MSU game in 2007. It makes a big difference when you start on the road.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:56 am to GeauxBob
Agreed, I'll have to admit I have hated Miles ever since he not only talked down the PAC 10 but specifically (and sarcastically) called out UW as weak, easy to kick us while we're down I guess...but we'll be back, he should have known that.
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:56 am to Goose
Washington just came out and tried to prove a point that this isn't the same Husky team of last year..
I don't believe LSU played all that bad tonight.... Considering!
It was 9:30 pm and playing to almost 1:00 morning had a lot to do with it. Like giving up that last TD, Those Tigahs were ready to go home...
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:57 am to BayouBengals03
We blitzed the corner a ton on 3rd down, letting them abuse the frick out of us on those slants
Posted on 9/6/09 at 2:58 am to Geauxld Finger
We won without playing near to our potential, which is the sign of an inexperienced but very talented team.

Popular
Back to top

5






