Started By
Message

re: Better Pro RB: Scott or Keiland

Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:26 pm to
Posted by Sammich
Member since Apr 2004
9375 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

your right. there are no count the zero elusive backs in the nfl.


Your sentence makes no sense. But I think you are trying to say Keiland elusive.

Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12507 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.
That's a lot of eluding.

Posted by harper6464
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
8121 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Your sentence makes no sense. But I think you are trying to say Keiland elusive.

Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.


i assume your trying to say keiland only runs side to side and backwards? (which is childish)

plese explain how keiland has broken off numerous 20+yd carries
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59469 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:28 pm to
Just to clarify, I"m not saying Keiland won't be a good pro, but to say that he definitely has more NFL potential than Scott is SFPtarded.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81265 posts
Posted on 8/28/09 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Please explain how a RB, any running back, gets dropped for a 14 yard Loss on a running play.


explain how he still averaged 6.8 yards per carry in that game
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram