- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:02 am to TigerBait1127
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:02 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
in the book, dumbledor stunned potter before snape killed him so he couldn't do anything. Once he died there was a huge battle scene through hogwarts, that was the highlight of the books. Snape does own him, but he does a pretty good job getting to him
And by what logic was this left out of the movie? This could have been a great scene.
Harry Potter is not a powerful wizard, overall, by the way. He is only powerful in one type of magic.
Posted on 7/20/09 at 10:05 am to theunknownknight
quote:
And by what logic was this left out of the movie? This could have been a great scene.
they didn't want it to compete with the battle in part 2 of the 7th book which is completely stupid
quote:
Harry Potter is not a powerful wizard, overall, by the way. He is only powerful in one type of magic.
meh, he is more powerful than the book gives him credit for and is (from my impression of the book) the most powerful one at hogwarts, at least when it comes to defense against the dark arts.
Posted on 7/26/09 at 11:45 am to theunknownknight
quote:
And by what logic was this left out of the movie? This could have been a great scene.
It is probably the single most climatic and emotional scene/sequence of events in the entire fricking series*, and they truncated it to a bare outline to include entirely new scenes to the movie/leave the Won-Won/Lavender shite in full length/etc.
They should have cut the Barrow burning scene to give nearly full dialogue/setup as in book, and even if they couldn't include the funeral sequence (which would probably wouldn't have translated to film well anyway), they should have included the "noble" separation from Ginny.
And actually have the whole phoenix lament. It wouldn't have taken any more airtime than the current half assed inclusion as it is mostly background sound that could have played when they go to Dumbledore's body at the base of the tower.
On and on. I was bored but okay with everything up to point of them coming back to the castle after the cave. They then just take a base outline from the book, don't allow it enough time to fully flesh it out, and then to piss off book fans even more, after excluding those elements, they then make shite up that adds NOTHING (for example, the wands in the air bit...seriously? They could have at least done more than just destroy the Dark Mark with that).
P.S. I only barely resisted the temptation of yelling "SNAPE KILLS DUMBLEDORE" right before the previews started in the packed theater simply because I despise the folks who are fans of the movies and haven't read the books. First couple I can see, but there are no excuses for it this late in the game. All the movies do as far as I am concerned is ruin the plot twists that make up most of the compelling page turning aspect of the series.
*SPOILERS:
The final battle for Hogwarts isn't that bad, but the actual final confrontation seemed a bit anti-climatic to me and just going through the formalities of victory. Not to mention it seemed like a complete cop-out....the wand refused to kill its rightful master? WTF, folks use wands against their master all in series. It is granted that the "foreign" wand just won't work as well.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News