Started By
Message

re: Official NCAA 10 Discussion Thread

Posted on 6/19/09 at 10:56 am to
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
67051 posts
Posted on 6/19/09 at 10:56 am to
i'm not arguing with you at all and pretty much agree to a T, but from the articles I've read...EA's BS excuse for not adding formation subs is that it would take thousands of man hours to add this feature to the game.


anyone want to start a collection pot to pay to have this feature added? I'll throw in 20.


without a doubt, LSU's running game would be damn near impossible to stop if we could utilize Scott, Williams, Murphy, and Trindon properly in the offense. Clemson too...
This post was edited on 6/19/09 at 10:58 am
Posted by PV
Member since May 2009
565 posts
Posted on 6/19/09 at 10:59 am to
quote:

BS excuse for not adding formation subs is that it would take thousands of man hours to add this feature to the game.


and yet they have all year to make the game
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
12998 posts
Posted on 6/19/09 at 11:00 am to
quote:

...EA's BS excuse for not adding formation subs it that it would take thousands of man hours to add this feature to the game.


It can't possibly be that hard. They had it in the old-gen systems. I just love the fact that they lose useful features and lose on the number of individual players (no FCS teams... yet still not room for 15 more players on each FBS) in the move from old-gen to new-gen. Baffling.

Honestly, how much less information are they using for the PS3 version of the game than say Metal Gear Solid 4 used. I would venture a guess that they haven't even scratched the surface of the PS3s potential with their first two installments of NCAA Football.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram