Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Maineri or Bianco?

Posted on 6/7/09 at 5:42 pm
Posted by MOSSMAN
Waveland, MS
Member since Jun 2005
100 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 5:42 pm
Thank you Mike Bianco for not taking the LSU job.
Posted by cjgulina
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Member since Aug 2005
1822 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 5:49 pm to
I believe he was spoken to about it, but do we really know if Skip offered it to him?

ETA: Over half of the ranters on here were bashing the Mainieri pick for almost 2 years saying we should have gotten Bianco. Not so much anymore.
This post was edited on 6/7/09 at 5:51 pm
Posted by jampat
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Jan 2007
11164 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 6:03 pm to
I have to admit, at the time Paul was hired I really want Bianco. I must say now that I am very happy with Maineri, and I think Bianco could of done just as well here at LSU. Maybe, possibly. I don't know how well Bianco recruits.
This post was edited on 6/7/09 at 6:04 pm
Posted by lsububbyb
baton rouge
Member since Apr 2009
425 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 7:10 pm to
i think bianco is a good coach, but i don't think bianco/ole miss will ever attract the players that LSU does. i'm extremely pleased with the job maineri has done, and wouldn't want anyone else (yet)
Posted by The Creaux
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2006
1063 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 7:19 pm to
All I had to do is listen to this guy speak. I knew when I heard the first Paul Mainieri interview that we were in good hands. I can see this guy go into any living room in America and recruit with the best of them. He knows baseball, has great recruiting skills, teaches the game well and is fiery in the dugout.
Posted by Padge1
Prairieville
Member since Jun 2008
136 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:07 pm to
PM left a program that he had built into a winner. He raised expectations at Notre Dame, and was very happy there. That sounds very similar to Bianco’s situation. The difference was that Mainieri wanted to be the best. He wanted to go where he could compete for National Championships on a regular basis. Maybe Bianco thanks that he can do at Ole Miss what Skip did here, and he would get all of the credit. I’m not criticizing Bianco for staying in Oxford, but perhaps it does say something about the two men.
Posted by Rockerbraves
Greatest Nation on Earth
Member since Feb 2007
8015 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:12 pm to
Anyone who would have immediately followed Skip would have had a tough time being successful.
Posted by mytigger
Member since Jan 2008
15260 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

and is fiery in the dugout.


I was with you til right here.....
Posted by JMB1964
Oscar, La.
Member since Jan 2007
433 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:18 pm to
Is that the explanation of Smoke's attempt?
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
81765 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:22 pm to
I remember there was a thread on here after Mainieri's 1st year asking who you would prefer, and of course 95% wanted Bianco. Only because they knew who he was but knew nothing about Mainieri
Posted by Rockerbraves
Greatest Nation on Earth
Member since Feb 2007
8015 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:23 pm to
Sort of:

FYI While at ULM, Laval posted a record of 241-159, a winning pecentage of .603, and led the Indians (Now Warhawks) to 3 NCAA regional appearances.

Everyone knew the expectations were lofty for Laval when he accepted the job as head coach at LSU. Replacing a legend is never easy, but Laval appeared to be up for the challenge. In his first year, Laval led the Tigers to a 44-22 record overall. The Tigers hosted a regional in Baton Rouge, which they won, and moved on to the Houston Super-Regional to face Rice, where their season ended. His first year at the helm raised expectations even more after he experienced great success.

In 2003 and 2004, Laval would lead the Tigers to 45-22-1 and 46-19 overall record respectively. LSU would earn the #2 national seed in the 2003 tournament, and would host a super regional both years, meaning the road to Omaha went through Baton Rouge. LSU was able to get Omaha both years, but disappointed both years posting an 0-2 each year. The Tigers were not used to losing in Omaha, so questions about Laval's leadership and ability to continue the success of program began to arise. Laval would have to prove himself the following year.

In 2005, LSU struggled during the regular season despite the fact they finished with a 40-22 record overall. The Tigers lost 12 Southeastern Conference games, as well as, losing to Southern for only the second time in 41 tries. Rice would go on to defeat the Tigers in the Baton Rouge Regional Finals. The 2006 season would put even more pressure on Laval, and would eventually be his last.

Posted by Purple Forever
Someplace Special on the Bayou
Member since Aug 2008
829 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:32 pm to
Either one!!!!
Posted by FightinTigers1
Covington,La.
Member since Jun 2009
541 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:36 pm to
I think PM was a great choice for LSU. Bianco doesn't like Bertman for what ever reason ,so I never thought he would be a good fit with the Tigers. Pm can not only recruit top talent but he gets them to actually play here rather than go pro. This is what Laval had trouble doing and it cost him his job. I like the way PM teaches,motivates and makes moves to find players who can play multiple positions at clutch times in games. PM is a much better choice for LSU than Bianco.
Posted by pttigris
Denham Springs, LA
Member since Sep 2006
102 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:37 pm to
Thanks for the chronologocal explanation of what it means to be "smoked" Rocker!!
Posted by mametoo
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2008
3276 posts
Posted on 6/7/09 at 8:56 pm to
Bianco would have done just fine at LSU. It is far more difficult to recruit a player to Oxford than it is to Baton Rouge.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram