Started By
Message

re: Nola

Posted on 5/22/09 at 10:33 pm to
Posted by LittleJerry
Dallas
Member since Dec 2007
1038 posts
Posted on 5/22/09 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

we would have lost tonight if not for his defense.


This is right on. It's simple; anyone who thinks Nola should not be starting at short is a f*&king retard and knows jack shite about baseball. Plain and simple.
Posted by Tino
:yawn:
Member since Dec 2004
86225 posts
Posted on 5/22/09 at 10:37 pm to
quote:

This is right on. It's simple; anyone who thinks Nola should not be starting at short is a f*&king retard and knows jack shite about baseball. Plain and simple.


Post of the night
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 5/22/09 at 10:40 pm to
Really? Because I thought Schimpf was a plus defender at second and DJ has made more errors at second than at short. He hasn't fielded the position as well as he had at short. Nola's fielding percentage, a fairly unreliable stat admittedly, is worse than DJ's or Schimpf's. The team has turned 28 double plays on the season, Nola has been involved in 9 of them. That's close to a third and he's had about a third of the playing time.

I don't know. I think there might be a defensive upgrade, but it hasn't shown up in the box score. But even assuming it's there and it's real, it is probably fairly small and I wonder -- is it worth the offensive cost?

I'm happy to discuss this civilly. But if you can't keep from name calling, it merely demonstrates to me you don't have much of a case.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram