Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Why can’t we just have automated strike Zone on every pitch

Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:20 pm
Posted by kjntgr
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8897 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:20 pm
The ump wears an earpiece to tell him it’s a ball or strike


No appeal needed
Posted by Splackavellie
Bayou
Member since Oct 2017
12468 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:35 pm to
Probably the same reason Angel Hernandez had a job for so long.......unions.
Posted by SWLA92
SWLA
Member since Feb 2015
4934 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:38 pm to
South Korea has implemented that in their professional league. It also isn’t fail proof…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Translator
Member since May 2025
775 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 10:45 pm to
I haven't watched too much MLB this season yet, but have there been calls challenged where the batter is walking off for a presumed ball-four count, and been right yet? I know that's often been an automatic with umps to call it a strike damn near every time.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29869 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:21 pm to
Technology can frick some shite up. I’ve watched baseball since I was 5. 35 years later, I’ve never thought that my team lost because of balls and strikes. There’s an artistic beauty in being able to paint a corner based on a particular umpire.

Well enough wasn’t left alone. Soon, every call will be relayed in an earpiece, and even if wrong, challenges won’t be available.

There were issues with baseball prior to this year, but balls and strikes wasn’t the main one.
Posted by Recognizable Poster
Geaux Tigers
Member since Mar 2026
167 posts
Posted on 4/1/26 at 11:33 pm to
Eventually I think it will. It's ultimately up to the owners to make the rule change. It's a delicate balance between the interests of the umpires' union, MLBPA, and the fans.

There are a lot of traditionalists that won't be amenable to the change. But as time goes on and newer generations of fans grow in numbers, I think it is inevitable. For example, many purists were against the pitch clock at first but have changed their tune after seeing how it has enhanced gameplay overall.

We shall see...
This post was edited on 4/1/26 at 11:38 pm
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4961 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 2:38 am to
quote:

It also isn’t fail proof


It doesn't have to be, it just needs to be better than humans eyeballing it, and it certainly would be.
Posted by CRDNLSCHMCPSN11
Member since Dec 2014
18305 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 4:05 am to
That's what I thought was supposed to happen. Is it still eventually supposed to take place?
Posted by Horsemeat
2025 Contributor Of The Year
Member since Dec 2014
15413 posts
Posted on 4/2/26 at 5:14 am to
Because automation is bullshite - some things need the human element for entertainment. What is needed is stronger accountability for shitty egotistical umpires like Angel, CB, Kulpa, etc. I miss the days of managers and umpires being belly to belly spitting in each others faces over bad calls in an afternoon game in early August where everyone is miserable working a game between two teams already out of the playoffs, but with everyone so hyper focused on gambling now those days are over. It's not about entertainment, it's about making money off the players.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram