- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gang of 8 Meeting in Advance of SOTU Address
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:23 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
A high-level Gang of Eight meeting just hours before the State of the Union.
Gang of Eight, for the uninitiated, is leadership and top lawmakers on intel.
Speaker Mike Johnson
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries
Senate Majority Leader John Thune
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer
Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.)
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.)
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.)
Interesting timing. Iran coming very soon or could it be something he intends to address during his speech?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:26 pm to AlterEd
Something tells me anything these 8 people are told will be the exact opposite of what is to come.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:27 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Interesting timing. Iran coming very soon or could it be something he intends to address during his speech?
Was thinking earlier, I wonder if the initial strike takes place during the speech... No way Iran would be expecting that.
"And while I am here addressing our nation, the proud members of our military are strategically striking Iranian targets"
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:31 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Was thinking earlier, I wonder if the initial strike takes place during the speech... No way Iran would be expecting that.
Them holding a briefing like this before a SOTU is rare according to Grok. It would seem to indicate something is imminent. I was wondering if they might launch their attack immediately following the address while the Democrats are trying to give their rebuttal.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:31 pm to 4LSU2
Yeah no way you tell those clowns anything too juicy.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:32 pm to Jbird
If it's something he intends to disclose during his speech that is considered a matter of national security he is required by law to notify these people. If the information is classified.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:33 pm to AlterEd
Those worthless turds should all be given unique, traceable copies of the SOTU to see which of them leaks it first.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:33 pm to AlterEd
Lol okay Boar.
Not the point but ok
Not the point but ok
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:34 pm to Jbird

This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:35 pm to AlterEd
He isn't going to tell those frick Sticks anything tactical in the operation.
He will tell them the fricking league minimum that's required is true point.
He will tell them the fricking league minimum that's required is true point.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:36 pm to AlterEd
Lol I understand Boar again if you think he is telling them anything Opsec related you are nuts.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:37 pm to Jbird
quote:
He isn't going to tell those frick Sticks anything tactical in the operation.
Right. But I do believe he would be required by law to notify these people that an attack is about to happen. Not necessarily any details of it.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:39 pm to AlterEd
Yeah
Hey we may of may or maybe not be knocking some dicks in the dirt. Driven by Thursday's meeting with Saudi dicks.
There you go gang of eight leakers you have been notified of possible military action
Thank you for your attention in the matter
Hey we may of may or maybe not be knocking some dicks in the dirt. Driven by Thursday's meeting with Saudi dicks.
There you go gang of eight leakers you have been notified of possible military action
Thank you for your attention in the matter
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:40 pm to Jbird
I wonder if any word will trickle out between now and then. It'll be interesting to keep an eye on.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:42 pm to AlterEd
I remember when there were read in press people back in the 80s.
The Reagan admin read them in and swore them to secrecy on a military operation
It was a fake and nearly everyone of the security clearances frickers leaked the operation.
These fricks on the gang if stupid are no better.
The Reagan admin read them in and swore them to secrecy on a military operation
It was a fake and nearly everyone of the security clearances frickers leaked the operation.
These fricks on the gang if stupid are no better.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 2:43 pm
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:44 pm to Jbird
I'm sure that was probably the last time that shite ever happened.
It certainly wouldn't happen today.
It certainly wouldn't happen today.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:45 pm to AlterEd
Lol they would do it in a heartbeat.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:48 pm to AlterEd
There are only 3 people in that list that I would tell anything important to.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:49 pm to AlterEd
quote:
I was wondering if they might launch their attack immediately following the address while the Democrats are trying to give their rebuttal
That would be incredible.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 2:51 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
That would be incredible.
Yes it would be.
And it would be on par for some shite Trump would pull just to troll them too.
Popular
Back to top

7




