- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can the DOJ release documents concerning ongoing investigations?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:26 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 8:26 am
Simply yes or no.
I will wait for 4Slowies to chime in.
I will wait for 4Slowies to chime in.
6
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:05 am to Jbird
They won't be here, unless they think up a deflective commentary that they recall from their 5 a.m. Daily Goose-Step Marching Orders.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:14 am to DByrd2
Simple question weird none of the experts care to chime in.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:14 am to Jbird
Not typically.
That's not just a doj rule either. That's pretty standard with all law enforcement agencies, state and federal
That's not just a doj rule either. That's pretty standard with all law enforcement agencies, state and federal
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 9:15 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:15 am to Jbird
No.
Massie knew this too. The verbiage in the bill for this is weak and he will not be able to challenge it.
Massie knew this too. The verbiage in the bill for this is weak and he will not be able to challenge it.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
Well that's interesting. So if documents aren't released because of the fact investigations are on going it's going to be a fun time
Dems are already stating an active investigation can't be used to stop the release of all documents.
Here I thought they were looking for justice for the girls.
Seems that's not the case
Weird
Dems are already stating an active investigation can't be used to stop the release of all documents.
Here I thought they were looking for justice for the girls.
Seems that's not the case
Weird
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:19 am to Jbird
Depending on which specific documents are in play, I don't know why any ongoing investigation would be going on with Epstein, considering I believe the focus is on the doj files that already led to indictment and a completed prosecution of Maxwell.
That's probably going to be the response. If anyone attempts the rouge I would imagine
That's probably going to be the response. If anyone attempts the rouge I would imagine
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
Lol so people identified in the documents aren't being investigated.
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 11/21/25 at 9:23 am
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Depending on which specific documents are in play, I don't know why any ongoing investigation would be going on with Epstein, considering I believe the focus is on the doj files that already led to indictment and a completed prosecution of Maxwell.
Didn’t Bondi just open a new investigation? Could be convenient for things they want to redact.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:24 am to Decatur
There it is
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:26 am to Jbird
quote:
Lol so people identified in the documents aren't being investigated.
The indictments were in 2019
There has never really been any indication that there was any investigation going on related to that prosecution with any other person. I don't know why we would assume that any investigation is ongoing at this point, 6 years later
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Why would we assume documents would be witheld?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:27 am to Jbird
So you think Bondi is going to redact a bunch of stuff based on this new probe she just opened?
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:28 am to Jbird
Depends on the document in question.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:29 am to Decatur
No hack I am enjoying the fact the top Dems are running the mantra now
So smooth brained types can yowl not everything was released.
So smooth brained types can yowl not everything was released.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:29 am to Jbird
quote:
Why would we assume documents would be witheld?
Where did I assume that?
I'm arguing that there shouldn't be any withheld for that reason
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
Dems are running the talking point
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:31 am to Jbird
Well either they redact stuff based on a new investigation or they don’t.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:32 am to Decatur
Your Dems are setting up the outrage.
Posted on 11/21/25 at 9:32 am to Jbird
quote:
Dems are running the talking point
You started this thread, brother.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News