- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could this be the reason for the resignations at the CDC?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:32 am
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:32 am
6
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:35 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
The pharmacy companies can no longer claim we are in “emergency” status. How bogus was that? Maybe they are covered going back, but they better shut that shite down going forward or they can now be held liable
Posted on 8/31/25 at 9:56 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Too much money in pharma . They are influeincing too many. Will continue as long as Americans keep paying high medical costs and medical insurance that only funnels huge moneys to pharma
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:01 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Investigate safety and efficacy of the vaccines
Why? We already know they are 100% safe and effective. SFP and TigerDoc told me so. What more do we need?
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:25 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
ChatGPT helped refine my take:
The widespread promotion of mRNA vaccination—a novel platform using a novel antigen—for low-risk populations, including babies, children, and healthy young adults, was a deeply flawed public health strategy. This approach failed to account for critical immunological realities such as immune imprinting and the potential for detrimental non-specific effects, especially in developing immune systems. These are well-known concepts within vaccinology and immunology, yet were rarely, if ever, communicated to the public.
For those at genuinely high risk of severe COVID-19, the calculated risk of a novel intervention may have been justified. But extending this intervention to entire populations—without transparent risk stratification—was scientifically and ethically indefensible.
The individuals and institutions responsible for shaping and promoting these blanket policies should be held accountable for disregarding known immunological principles and for undermining public trust. This was not sound science; it was a failure of scientific integrity and responsible policy-making.
The widespread promotion of mRNA vaccination—a novel platform using a novel antigen—for low-risk populations, including babies, children, and healthy young adults, was a deeply flawed public health strategy. This approach failed to account for critical immunological realities such as immune imprinting and the potential for detrimental non-specific effects, especially in developing immune systems. These are well-known concepts within vaccinology and immunology, yet were rarely, if ever, communicated to the public.
For those at genuinely high risk of severe COVID-19, the calculated risk of a novel intervention may have been justified. But extending this intervention to entire populations—without transparent risk stratification—was scientifically and ethically indefensible.
The individuals and institutions responsible for shaping and promoting these blanket policies should be held accountable for disregarding known immunological principles and for undermining public trust. This was not sound science; it was a failure of scientific integrity and responsible policy-making.
Posted on 8/31/25 at 10:51 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
So if they resign, then no matter what the investigation finds they can just say “Sorry, don’t work there any more, frick off”?
That doesn’t seem to make much sense
That doesn’t seem to make much sense
Posted on 8/31/25 at 1:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Probably some truth to this. If they're still employed then then have to cooperate in any investigation and can be indicted for lying to federal agents if they don't tell the truth. If they don't cooperate, they can be fired for cause.
On the other hand, if they are former employees tney can tell federal investigators to pound sand and then refuse to testify and/or take the Fifth Amendments when compelled to testify.
Either way, they ain't f*cking talking!!! They know exactly what they did and the crimes against humanity that they helped commit and cover up.
On the other hand, if they are former employees tney can tell federal investigators to pound sand and then refuse to testify and/or take the Fifth Amendments when compelled to testify.
Either way, they ain't f*cking talking!!! They know exactly what they did and the crimes against humanity that they helped commit and cover up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News