- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Which is more pathetic: “weird” (aka Vance lies) or “Trump backed out debating Sheboss”?
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:40 pm
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:40 pm
1. The Vance shite is out of nowhere. Thin air.
His book/movie have been out for years. Story of hardships. I have very liberal friends who love the book. All of a sudden:
Vance beats women, fricks couches (I mean, what red blooded man hasn’t? And more seriously where’d that playground shite come from and more importantly who cares? Dems are now Puritans?), has a fake beard (the lead singer of the Decemberists actually said that at his show last Fri—I yelled “Fight! Fight! Fight!” in response. That was fun. Right at stage) and what else?
2. Then the Kamala-debate trope: this one concerns me because it’s so stupid it is yet another indicator that it doesn’t matter what the Democrats do or fail to do, they know it’s ultimately in the bag.
You yanked your senile candidate that you’ve propped up for 4+ years, after he was abused in one of the two debates to which he (doing his best-worst Clint Eastwood) challenged Trump, stick in a stuffed sausage woman who hasn’t even been nominated, and then fabricating that somehow Trump is afraid to debate said sausage. I mean wut?
I just needed to vent a little about this mess. I think no. 2 is more pathetic and no. 1 is just stupid. Both are stupid and pathetic so this isn’t a very challenging exercise. Sorry.
His book/movie have been out for years. Story of hardships. I have very liberal friends who love the book. All of a sudden:
Vance beats women, fricks couches (I mean, what red blooded man hasn’t? And more seriously where’d that playground shite come from and more importantly who cares? Dems are now Puritans?), has a fake beard (the lead singer of the Decemberists actually said that at his show last Fri—I yelled “Fight! Fight! Fight!” in response. That was fun. Right at stage) and what else?
2. Then the Kamala-debate trope: this one concerns me because it’s so stupid it is yet another indicator that it doesn’t matter what the Democrats do or fail to do, they know it’s ultimately in the bag.
You yanked your senile candidate that you’ve propped up for 4+ years, after he was abused in one of the two debates to which he (doing his best-worst Clint Eastwood) challenged Trump, stick in a stuffed sausage woman who hasn’t even been nominated, and then fabricating that somehow Trump is afraid to debate said sausage. I mean wut?
I just needed to vent a little about this mess. I think no. 2 is more pathetic and no. 1 is just stupid. Both are stupid and pathetic so this isn’t a very challenging exercise. Sorry.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:41 pm to McLemore
Trump showed up to probably the most hostile forum he could today, but he's somehow afraid to debate Kamala? Even the people spouting this don't believe it. Trump is pathological.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:42 pm to McLemore
Im posting to let you know i read your journal entry.
Also, yes. They can just say whatever the frick they want and roughly 50% swallow it whole. Even if Trump wins, the stupid isnt fixed. I weep for the country.
Also, yes. They can just say whatever the frick they want and roughly 50% swallow it whole. Even if Trump wins, the stupid isnt fixed. I weep for the country.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:44 pm to McLemore
Trump said he will debate on Fox.
I don't blame him for saying no to ABC. It would be a hatchet job.
I don't blame him for saying no to ABC. It would be a hatchet job.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:46 pm to LSUnation78
quote:
let you know i read your journal entry.
lol. Thx for humoring me. I don’t start many topics because I like to ramble. Usually spare you fine folks. But these are special times.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:48 pm to McLemore
They've to muddy trump...because Kamala is so horrible and cringe.
Kamala's campaign and Democrats want to desperately debate trump because trump is the official nominee for the gop. ..while Kamala isn't the official nominee for the dnc. Kamala is still on unstable ground and no one knows if she'll even be the nominee. But if she debates trump, they can create the illusion of two official nominees going at it.
Kamala's campaign and Democrats want to desperately debate trump because trump is the official nominee for the gop. ..while Kamala isn't the official nominee for the dnc. Kamala is still on unstable ground and no one knows if she'll even be the nominee. But if she debates trump, they can create the illusion of two official nominees going at it.
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:52 pm to McLemore
I thought he said he would be happy to debate her after the DNC? I wouldn't want to debate her before either. So they can keep swapping out for a "better" candidate after he exposes them in the debate?
Posted on 7/31/24 at 5:53 pm to McLemore
The whole “say it to my face” line is the more pathetic of the two, in my opinion.
After MSM has spent the last eight years repeating ad nauseam that Trump’s rhetoric is crude, coarse, dangerous to our democracy, and violence-inciting, we’re now supposed to believe he is ducking a chance to publicly debate Harris?
A better question would be what WON’T Trump say to Harris’s face.
After MSM has spent the last eight years repeating ad nauseam that Trump’s rhetoric is crude, coarse, dangerous to our democracy, and violence-inciting, we’re now supposed to believe he is ducking a chance to publicly debate Harris?
A better question would be what WON’T Trump say to Harris’s face.
Popular
Back to top
7











