I wouldn't say no breaks.

On the fake punt pass, it was CLEARLY a completed pass, down by contact, and a fumble. Yet somehow the refs called it incomplete on the field? I laughed my arse off at that one and counted the Saints' blessings.

They also got away with a IMO blatant PI earlier.

It's more that they can never catch a break in the clutch in the most desperate of situations.

Too bad, too.

4 ...

Report Post

Posted by geaux1227

baton rouge, louisiana

Member since Sep 2008

2007 posts

Posted on 12/22/08 at 9:15 pm to bballingenyus23

saints are a dome team, and aren't used to playing in freezing temperatures. besides, the packers and bears play every year, twice a year.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by cajun83

Lafayette Louisiana

Member since Sep 2008

20 posts

Posted on 12/22/08 at 10:14 pm to bballingenyus23

I believe by NO breaks they possibly meant NO as in New Orleans kind of breaks.

Which is basically Murphy's Law

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerBait1127

Houston

Member since Jun 2005

47336 posts

Posted on 12/22/08 at 10:17 pm to bballingenyus23

quote:
On the fake punt pass, it was CLEARLY a completed pass, down by contact, and a fumble.

disagree, and it definitely wasn't CLEARLY completed

and we couldn't catch a break in the Minn. game, hell the refs wouldn't give us normal calls

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BilJ

Member since Sep 2003

158842 posts

Posted on 12/22/08 at 10:56 pm to bballingenyus23

quote:
On the fake punt pass, it was CLEARLY a completed pass, down by contact, and a fumble. Yet somehow the refs called it incomplete on the field? I laughed my arse off at that one and counted the Saints' blessings.

oh really clearly? the rule book disagrees

collinsworth said after seeing the replay one time it was the correct call. we got a break by him not making the catch, not on the ruling.

This post was edited on 12/22/08 at 10:58 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board