Yep I called it. You told me I couldn't even list the crimes and now, without even admitting how incredibly wrong you were, want to start debating the merits of them.

I'm not jumping through hoops for someone that can't admit that they fricked up when they obviously did. If you want to step across the line and join me in reality, we can discuss the crimes.

quote:
You posted a wiki article.

Is this how rotted out your critical thinking abilities are? You can't simply follow the links that bring you to the actual legal filings? You swallow everything that Epsteins best friend says but you can't follow a link that is provided to you to get to the truth. It's pathetic.

Starts on page 21, section C.
LINK

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by BBONDS25

Member since Mar 2008

48958 posts

Posted on 5/21/24 at 5:03 pm to RedStickFox

quote:
Yep I called it. You told me I couldn't even list the crimes and now, without even admitting how incredibly wrong you were, want to start debating the merits of them.

Loook one post up, dummy. Not a single one of those “crimes” were in any charging document. Not a single one of those crimes were tried in the trial.

quote:
I'm not jumping through hoops for someone that can't admit that they fricked up when they obviously did. If you want to step across the line and join me in reality, we can discuss the crimes.

Oh my.

quote:
You can't simply follow the links that bring you to the actual legal filings?

I’d love to discuss the legal filings and evidence presented to support those filings with you. Where do you want to start?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by BBONDS25

Member since Mar 2008

48958 posts

Posted on 5/21/24 at 5:05 pm to RedStickFox

quote:
Starts on page 21, section C.

Yep an opposition to a motion to dismiss. Beautiful. Now link the charging document that alleges these crimes and then let’s discuss the evidence presented in court supporting those charging documents. You know…because that is how criminal trials work.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Corso