Started By
Message

re: Should Trump pull an EWE and not offer a defense?

Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:15 am to
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Communist USA
Member since Nov 2007
12544 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 3:15 am to
My Father was a defendent in that EWE trial. The move to not present a defense, which almost killed my mother, as it was a RICO prosecution and we would have been left with basically the clothes on our backs, and my Father in prison for 250 years, was as much about it being a second trial with an 11-1 not guilty vote in the first, as it was about EWE being a bigger than life figure to the jury...
In hindsight, the move as brilliant. One, because it worked, and two because the jury was already exhausted of months of complicated business data that I don't think they fully understood.
I am not sure the Trump trial is similar enough in "scope" to do this.....building hospitals and nursing homes versus paying off gold digging porn stars to shut up.
Similar charismatic defendents, not similar crime content.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
63572 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 4:10 am to
Yeah, after hearing Costello, they better put him on for dang sure, he has all the inside knowledge of how corrupt the prosecution was here, and all the excluded exculpatory evidence the Grand Jury never got to hear,
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
29727 posts
Posted on 5/21/24 at 7:35 am to
Plus John Volz was such an asshat. That case was weak on top of everything else.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram