Started By
Message

re: A Question for Cane Farmers on Cold Tolerance

Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:06 pm to
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12747 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

Gotcha. Sounds more like a milling bottleneck than a growing/climate bottleneck, then.

That's not the case. There's new acres getting put into cane every year. It's literally a climate and soils issue.

Sugarcane is a tropical crop. South American farmers can get multiple harvests out of a field in a single year, and the cane is much larger down there.

Here, however, cane is at its northern limits. This is part of the reason cane stubble is burned, because if they leave it on the ground too long, the soil may not get to the temperature it needs to be long enough for growth. Once you get far enough north where hard freezes happen pretty regularly, the climate is no longer suitable for cane.

On top of that, the best soils for can production are the alluvial soils along the Atchafalaya and Mississippi. Once you get so far west (i.e., onto the prairie), the productivity of those soils drops of significantly.
This post was edited on 5/15/24 at 2:08 pm
Posted by Decisions
Member since Mar 2015
1493 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

cane is at its northern limits.


Current northern limits. It wasn’t that long ago that many would have laughed at the idea of Avoyelles (and even Concordia, briefly) growing cane, but it’s happened.

I think we’ve just got a logistics problem, personally. I’m aware of the soil situation. As long as it’s alluvial and not loess it’ll be up to the challenge. I’m sure a freak frost can and would happen occasionally, but according to the hardiness/climate maps I’ve looked at cane could certainly be pushed farther north.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram