Started By
Message

re: Clark: Pels open to BI extension, but not at max

Posted on 5/12/24 at 2:46 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111291 posts
Posted on 5/12/24 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

35 million per year max

Pay him right under what Zion makes

So basically a 4/140 extension is what I would offer
I just don't see why we'd want him at this point.

He's not going to change his shot profile. He's not going to commit to Zion being the guy, and when he doesn't, Willie is likely to appease him and go back to making Zion take the back seat again so BI can be the guy. Just because Zion was the #1 dude after the All Star break doesn't mean BI will be happy with it for 4 more seasons, I'd argue he 100% won't. And then what... If Willie is here, then you get BI as your #1 and Zion #2. If a coach who will stand up to BI is here, then you still need to trade him then, so why not just do it now?


We've also shown over the last 2 seasons that we can be even better when he doesn't play, albeit very close, so at worst, we've been no better when he plays.
Posted by 3PieceSpicy
Metairie
Member since Jan 2021
6299 posts
Posted on 5/15/24 at 4:18 pm to
What’s the worst trade/deal you would accept for Ingram?

Honest question, since you wouldn’t be willing to bring him back for $35M if we find no deals to our liking.

I’d like to move him too, but I’d need a certain level of player back. I’m not taking back a mediocre player and some future 1st’s from a contender like we did in the Jrue trade.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram