- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:19 pm to Le Tenia
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:19 pm to Le Tenia
quote:If the throwing lane is wide fricking open as well as jones being able to field the ball is wide arse open, then where is the interference?
Does the rule discuss throwing lanes or angles?
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:23 pm to lsupride87
quote:
If the throwing lane is wide fricking open as well as jones being able to field the ball is wide arse open, then where is the interference?
Did Milazzo throw it "right" to 1st base? I'm not asking if the throw was perfect. Did he throw the ball to 1st and was the runner inside the foul line at the time the ball got there?
The runner is running right into Bear. The collision is fair territory
Posted on 5/11/24 at 12:24 pm to lsupride87
And to make it even more clear
The runner re entered the lane before any contact with Jones. So, the contact at that point does not matter because there was no previous interference
Proof he had re-entered the lane before contact
[/img]
The rules are very clear here. The runner re-established himself in the lane before the collision. Try to deny it with the picture above. You can’t. You can be a man and admit you were wrong, or whine like a child
The runner re entered the lane before any contact with Jones. So, the contact at that point does not matter because there was no previous interference
quote:
However, it is not required for the runner to be within the runners lane the entire time up to 1st base. The runner may enter the lane at the 50’ mark, the 60’ mark or even the 80’ mark as long as both feet have established themselves within the lane, and no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time.
Proof he had re-entered the lane before contact
![](https://i.imgflip.com/8powjw.jpg)
The rules are very clear here. The runner re-established himself in the lane before the collision. Try to deny it with the picture above. You can’t. You can be a man and admit you were wrong, or whine like a child
This post was edited on 5/11/24 at 12:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)