Started By
Message

re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:53 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
43139 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Literally only one way that play happens bad for LSU and it happened last night bc the ball wasn’t catchable and therefore no one interfered with the catch.

This is sort of my interpretation also - I had to read up on this rule - never knew much about it because I was taught to stay in the proper running lane.

The one time I did run in fair territory, I got called out. (that is how I learned about the rule - )

I still think that deliberately running inside fair territory for a ball that will be put in play behind you should be an automatic out - because that makes the fielder make a more difficult throw. The lane is there to ensure fair play - there should not be an exception to reward UNFAIR play.

But the rule is written as it is written - and that leaves it up to umpire's judgement on what is an 'easy play' vs 'more difficult play'

The umpires have enough to sort out in real time -

and Alabama refs do not need more latitude in exercising their 'discretion' - especially vs LSU
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram