- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:12 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 9:12 am to L S Usetheforce
I shouldn’t have to explain this to this board but here I am.
You can acknowledge that it should have been called interference with running out of baseline and also agree that we choked the game away. Both of those things can be true. Why can’t some of you comprehend this. Just because a person thinks the rule should’ve been called doesn’t mean they are “making excuses”.
You can acknowledge that it should have been called interference with running out of baseline and also agree that we choked the game away. Both of those things can be true. Why can’t some of you comprehend this. Just because a person thinks the rule should’ve been called doesn’t mean they are “making excuses”.
1
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:07 am to DhanTigers212
quote:
You can acknowledge that it should have been called interference with running out of baseline and also agree that we choked the game away.
THIS is the proper way to view the situation.
It is OK to discuss the fine points of how the rule was applied in this instance - WITHOUT making perforative comments on the player trying to do the best he could in the circumstance.
That was one play - there were MANY other mistakes along the way that should have made that play immaterial.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News