re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule

quote:

---

When are you going to shut the frick up?

---

Why don't you STFU!

quote:

---

It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule.

---

Well, that is easy to disprove since rule was provided on here several times over the years and there has been CWS finals decided on plays that similar.

quote:

---

No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”.

---

It's not my fault you can't understand what you're seeing. You fkn people trip me out. You're right though, people with a full brain can see and comprehend what they are seeing. Thanks for admitting and proving the point. Wow, you fkn idiot!

They should have never been in that situation but they were and nobody knows but Al and Bear if the kid illegally running inside the batter-runner path effected them fielding the ball at 1st or not. But the rule doesn't say ask them and find out. It says if the batter-runner does then it's interference. Should be as simple as that, even for you.