- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:57 am to L S Usetheforce
Posted on 5/11/24 at 7:57 am to L S Usetheforce
Directly from your article:
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
quote:
Finally, not only must the runner be running illegally, but also he must interfere. A runner who runs up the grass to 1st base (illegal), but doesn’t interfere with the fielder receiving the ball at 1st is NOT guilty of Runner’s Lane Interference
When are you going to shut the frick up? It wasn’t interference by any stretch of the imagination, either in written rules or by their interpretation based on the broader rule. No one with half a brain sees that picture and thinks “runner’s interference”. He wasn’t interfering with the play buddy, get over it.
3
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News