Started By
Message

re: The Official Trade Proposal Thread

Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:33 pm to
Posted by Pels_Yaz
Member since Apr 2023
9377 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

But 5-6 1sts is absolutely delusional at best.


I really think he’s purposefully trolling.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9868 posts
Posted on 5/11/24 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

I really think he’s purposefully trolling.



Yeah, that just comes off as condescending.

I look at the landscape and judge off past trades to come up with compensation. Honestly those 5 picks are shite. The Sixers pick is 16 this year. Our pick next year would be in the 20's. Future picks in 26 and 28 from Philly (I am not sure who's pick they are), ours in 27. I don't think that's a great haul. I like Daniels, but I don't believe he's considered a great prospect at this point. I'm not even sure what position he is going to wind up, but he's not getting minutes on this team and can't get any better on the bench. He needs a change of scenery.

James Harden (and PJ Tucker) got back 3 1sts, a swap, 2 2nds and cash. I think that White and Vucevic would have more value, especially since neither are expiring or locker room cancers. I believe that you think that Vucevic is a negative asset, which is your right. But I do not agree. Some of the value comes with him.

White is an emerging star. He is super cheap. He will make less than 24M over the next two seasons combined. Ingram will probably make triple that amount. It just seems like a no brainer to me. He would be perfect for us..
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram