- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kennedy reaffirms he supports full term abortions
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:00 pm to Freauxzen
Posted on 5/9/24 at 10:00 pm to Freauxzen
Example: 8.5 months of pregnancy mother suffers from eclampsia, which can cause injury or death to mother and baby. Doctor decides to induce birth (termination of pregnancy). The goal is to preserve the life and health of both patients, mother and baby. The alternative is continuing the pregnancy and possibly losing both mom and baby. Inducing birth protects both of them.
Which option is more pro-life?
Which option is more pro-life?
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 10:17 pm
1
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:38 pm to CarpeDiem
quote:
8.5 months of pregnancy mother suffers from eclampsia, which can cause injury or death to mother and baby. Doctor decides to induce birth (termination of pregnancy). The goal is to preserve the life and health of both patients, mother and baby. The alternative is continuing the pregnancy and possibly losing both mom and baby. Inducing birth protects both of them.
Not an abortion.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News