Started By
Message

re: Beatles or Stones?

Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:43 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
143057 posts
Posted on 5/9/24 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

quote:

The Beatles were thugs pretending to be gentlemen, while The Stones were gentlemen pretending to be thugs." -- Some English musician whose name I forgot
I thought a publicist said that…60 years ago
I got from a book called, curiously, Beatles vs Stones

I honestly don't remember who said it
Posted by Burger55
Petite Anse
Member since Jan 2013
178 posts
Posted on 5/10/24 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I got from a book called, curiously, Beatles vs Stones

I hSean O’Mahony, publisher of both bands’ official fan magazines starting respectively in 1963 and 1964, crafted and softened their public images. He opines: “The Beatles were thugs who were put across as nice blokes, and the Rolling Stones were gentlemen who were made into thugs by Andrew [Loog Oldham, their manager].” McMillian accepts this as closer to the truth than the bands or their fans might admit during the next half a decade.onestly don't remember who said it
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram