- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Worth upgrading 11 year old DSLR for Mirrorless (Nikon specifically)
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:39 am to wickowick
Posted on 5/9/24 at 11:39 am to wickowick
quote:
The mirrorless is a huge jump, especially in sports, autofocus on fast-moving subjects, and low light.
From a technical perspective, phase detect autofocus in DSLR's is vastly superior to the contrast detect AF used in mirrorless cameras when it comes fast moving subjects. The problem is, since there is no mirror, you can't split the light beams in a mirrorless cam. Now contrast detect AF has come a long way since it were first introduced, but since contrast detect is predictive, it will always be slower. But autofocus isn't the reason to go mirrorless. Size and convivence are.
This post was edited on 5/9/24 at 11:41 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News