- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marvel Will Release No More Than Three Movies and Two Shows Per Year, Bob Iger Says
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:52 am to CocomoLSU
Posted on 5/8/24 at 8:52 am to CocomoLSU
Those budgets are hilarious too. When Alan Horn came over from WB, he brought a lot of his accounting bullshite over which is top notch bullshite.
Essentially these studios will create an LLC for each blockbuster they put out. The Studio will “loan out” $250 million or whatever is listed as the “budget” to that LLC (with interest too) in order to produce whatever movie the LLC was created for. Unless a movie is an unequivocal failure (like $250 million budget and only makes $400 million or less), then the studio almost always gets something back.
What a lot of folks always ignore is that while the box office is a huge piece of the pie, marketing tie ins, whether it’s in film or commercials can rack it up for a studio and that doesn’t even begin to factor in merchandising dollars.
BVS was a disappointment at the box office but drew over $250 million in revenue for Warner Brothers before a single ticket was sold purely off of marketing partnerships. That doesn’t include any merchandising sales either. And with those revenue sources, they aren’t splitting the pie with anyone else.
Don’t even get me started on the bullshite they pull with streaming services. Some are “struggling”, but none of the majors are failing in the financial sense.
Essentially these studios will create an LLC for each blockbuster they put out. The Studio will “loan out” $250 million or whatever is listed as the “budget” to that LLC (with interest too) in order to produce whatever movie the LLC was created for. Unless a movie is an unequivocal failure (like $250 million budget and only makes $400 million or less), then the studio almost always gets something back.
What a lot of folks always ignore is that while the box office is a huge piece of the pie, marketing tie ins, whether it’s in film or commercials can rack it up for a studio and that doesn’t even begin to factor in merchandising dollars.
BVS was a disappointment at the box office but drew over $250 million in revenue for Warner Brothers before a single ticket was sold purely off of marketing partnerships. That doesn’t include any merchandising sales either. And with those revenue sources, they aren’t splitting the pie with anyone else.
Don’t even get me started on the bullshite they pull with streaming services. Some are “struggling”, but none of the majors are failing in the financial sense.
Posted on 5/8/24 at 9:01 am to Dairy Sanders
quote:
Those budgets are hilarious too. When Alan Horn came over from WB, he brought a lot of his accounting bullshite over which is top notch bullshite.
It really is. Look what movies like Godzilla Minus One and Everything Everywhere All At Once were able to do with visual effects on a combined budget equal to one She Hulk episode. Not to mention EEAAO had a better execution of the multiverse than any marvel product so far. Both made around $125-150 million in the global box office and are considered incredible successes for their production companies. If a marvel movie doesn’t make that opening weekend it’s a complete failure
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)