Started By
Message

re: Dan Schneider Sues ‘Quiet On Set’ Producers For Defamation

Posted on 5/1/24 at 4:49 pm to
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12452 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 4:49 pm to
Agreed. He seemed more of an a-hole and misogynist and never a pedo. But they definitely portray it in a muddy manner. The real issue is did Dan know about any of it at the time like Paterno at Penn state?
This post was edited on 5/1/24 at 4:49 pm
Posted by Porpus
Covington, LA
Member since Aug 2022
1716 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 5:16 pm to
Do your homework. Penn State was a cash grab. Nobody got molested.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110010 posts
Posted on 5/1/24 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

The real issue is did Dan know about any of it at the time like Paterno at Penn state?


No the real issue is if any of Dan’s bosses knew about this, and the answer is “Yes”. That’s why the documentary makes Dan the fall guy because it’s tied up nicely in the end, and Dan isn’t explicitly called a pedophile. So Viacom itself is not held liable for this, which would destroy the studio if the rumors about Dan are true.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram