Started By
Message

re: City of St. George - good or bad for the long term future of GBR area?

Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:10 pm to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32211 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

This is like the Nola/Northshore discussions on the same topic. If Nola implodes, the NS is fricked


At least the northshore has a 20+ mile bridge between it and the south shore. Crime has trouble crossing that bridge. With BR and st G there’s not such a dividing line. Crime will still infringe and if the city implodes then crime will get worse.


On principle I agree with St G. The people wanted to change something they acted on it voted on it and won. It’s the most American process ever.

With that said I have worries about the long term
Posted by 3Son
1st Son in present times
Member since Jan 2017
2276 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:14 pm to


what is that missing almost square puzzle piece?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425819 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

At least the northshore has a 20+ mile bridge between it and the south shore. Crime has trouble crossing that bridge. With BR and st G there’s not such a dividing line. Crime will still infringe and if the city implodes then crime will get worse.

It's not only crime. The economy of the NS is based around Nola. The economy of STG is based around BR.

quote:

On principle I agree with St G. The people wanted to change something they acted on it voted on it and won. It’s the most American process ever.

With that said I have worries about the long term

I agree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram