Started By
Message

re: City of St. George - good or bad for the long term future of GBR area?

Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:51 pm to
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48352 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

According to the list of parish wide millages;

St. George residents don't pay for CATS, that's funded by Baton Rouge and Baker property taxes and federal grants, not the general fund. It was renewed last year so that's not going away anytime soon.

COA is funded by a parish wide property tax and grants, so their funding won't be affected by St. George incorporation either.


Unless I'm completely wrong about this (always a possibility) St. George incorporation won't do shite to cut funds from the bloated budgets of CATS, BREC, COA, etc. (departments/organizations with a dedicated funding souce.) The cuts will have to come from this list (general fund expenditures).


BR City has been siphoning around $50 million annually in tax revenue from the unincorporated areas to help fund BRPD and BRFD. That lost revenue is going to have to be made up somewhere - potentially by cutting nonessential programs like CATS.
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
14692 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

BR City has been siphoning around $50 million annually in tax revenue from the unincorporated areas to help fund BRPD and BRFD. That lost revenue is going to have to be made up somewhere - potentially by cutting nonessential programs like CATS.

Is that how it works? I honestly don't know. But it doesn't seem like you can take taxes specifically labelled as "10.600 BR CAPITAL AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM" and redirect those funds into the general fund.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 3:22 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram