- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:30 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:30 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Madison v. Marbury has nothing to do with the Constitution, but rather the SCOTUS interpretation of it.
This is going to get circular quickly considering that interpreting the Constitution is SCOTUS' constitutional duty.
ETA: As an aside, at what point did all this veer off from discussing executive immunity for a former POTUS and its nexus with impeachment to a purely hypothetical federal prosecution of a sitting POTUS (which has never happened and likely wont)?
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 4:32 pm
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:Is it?
This is going to get circular quickly
Perhaps go back and read insistences that the "Constitution says" certain things and we can square your "circular" in a quick minute.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News