- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:20 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:20 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Roe v Wade wasn't in the Constitution
Exactly
quote:
TX v PA sure as hell was not in the Constitution.
The concept of standing is judicial, and granted as an exercise of judicial review. Now, if you want to make the argument Madison v. Marbury was improper, feel free.
quote:
Where are Special Prosecutors noted in the Constitution?
They're granted by statute, which Congress has specifically in the Constitution.
quote:
How about wide-eyed mouth foaming Special Prosecutors (who were never endorsed by Congress) indicting ex-POTUSes? Is the latter enabled in the Constitution? Where?
They're granted by statute, which Congress has specifically in the Constitution.
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You referred to what is in the Constitution. Madison v. Marbury has nothing to do with literal content of the Constitution, but rather the SCOTUS interpretation of it's meaning.
Now, if you want to make the argument Madison v. Marbury was improper, feel free.
This post was edited on 4/29/24 at 4:31 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News