Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:06 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124349 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Secondly, that isn't in the Constitution.
Roe v Wade wasn't in the Constitution.
TX v PA sure as hell was not in the Constitution.
Opening our borders to illegal immigration to economically and civilly destroy TX is not in the Constitution,
nor is a denial to TX to defend its own borders from foreign invasion in the Constitution.

Where are Special Prosecutors noted in the Constitution? How about wide-eyed mouth foaming Special Prosecutors (who were never endorsed by Congress) indicting ex-POTUSes? Is the latter enabled in the Constitution? Where?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424516 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Roe v Wade wasn't in the Constitution

Exactly

quote:

TX v PA sure as hell was not in the Constitution.

The concept of standing is judicial, and granted as an exercise of judicial review. Now, if you want to make the argument Madison v. Marbury was improper, feel free.

quote:

Where are Special Prosecutors noted in the Constitution?

They're granted by statute, which Congress has specifically in the Constitution.

quote:

How about wide-eyed mouth foaming Special Prosecutors (who were never endorsed by Congress) indicting ex-POTUSes? Is the latter enabled in the Constitution? Where?

They're granted by statute, which Congress has specifically in the Constitution.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram