- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:47 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:47 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Cite the case, ruling or precedent.
Quoted prior to your post.
That case involved prosecution first (acquittal), and then impeachment-removal. During the criminal case, he made the literal same argument, and was rejected (joining another appellate circuit).
quote:
It is a matter of interpretation, just not your interpretation
And every federal appellate court who has had to rule on it.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Cite it or link it.
Quoted prior to your post.
I'm tired of milling through treads on Easter Egg hunts for posts which you claim say something that they actually don't.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News