Started By
Message

re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.

Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:47 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424693 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Cite the case, ruling or precedent.

Quoted prior to your post.

That case involved prosecution first (acquittal), and then impeachment-removal. During the criminal case, he made the literal same argument, and was rejected (joining another appellate circuit).

quote:

It is a matter of interpretation, just not your interpretation

And every federal appellate court who has had to rule on it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124400 posts
Posted on 4/29/24 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Quoted prior to your post.
Cite it or link it.
I'm tired of milling through treads on Easter Egg hunts for posts which you claim say something that they actually don't.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram