- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Andrew Weissmann's intentional ignorance on checks and balances.
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:52 am to Robin Masters
Posted on 4/29/24 at 8:52 am to Robin Masters
quote:
And if this law has been universally agreed upon why is the USSC hearing the case?
It hasn't come up with a President before. Nixon was pardoned before it could possibly be litigated (like his civil cases that are the backbone of the arguments in this case).
1
Posted on 4/29/24 at 9:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It hasn't come up with a President before.
One more time for the people in the back:
“The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law.”
-Alexander Hamilton
Federalist Papers 69
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News